SA v BN
The court found, on the balance of probabilities, that JN is alive, the documents produced by the mother and grandfather are fake, and the mother and grandfather know of JN's whereabouts. The removal of JN from the UK was orchestrated to avoid child protection proceedings, and the grandfather exercised unhealthy control over the mother.
- Parties
- Applicant: SA; 1st Respondent: BN; 2nd Respondent: JN; Intervener: CY; 3rd Respondent: X CC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Private Law Family Proceedings / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted; court finds JN is alive.
- Legal Topics
- Parental Responsibility, Contact Orders, Child Abduction, False Documentation, Wardship, Habitual Residence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SA
Applicant
BN
1st Respondent
JN
2nd Respondent
CY
Intervener
X CC
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Private Law Family Proceedings / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether JN is alive or deceased
- 2 Authenticity of documents purporting to evidence death
- 3 Parental responsibility and contact
Ratio Decidendi
The court found, on the balance of probabilities, that JN is alive, the documents produced by the mother and grandfather are fake, and the mother and grandfather know of JN's whereabouts. The removal of JN from the UK was orchestrated to avoid child protection proceedings, and the grandfather exercised unhealthy control over the mother.
Court Disposition
Application granted; court finds JN is alive.
Orders
- JN is declared alive.
- Orders made to ensure JN's return to the UK as soon as practicable.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment