SABmiller Plc, Re [2016] EWHC 2153 (Ch) (23 August 2016)
The court has jurisdiction under sections 895 and 896 of the Companies Act 2006 to order a meeting of only some shareholders with whom a scheme is proposed, where others voluntarily undertake to be bound by the scheme and forgo their right to attend and vote at the meeting. There is no statutory or legal necessity to require all such shareholders to be summoned if they consent to exclusion.
- Citation
- [2016] EWHC 2153 (Ch)
- Parties
- Applicant: SABMiller plc; Intervener/objector: Soroban Master Fund LP and Soroban Opportunities Master Fund LP; Shareholder/interested Party: Altria Group, Inc.; Interested Party: Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 August 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Companies Court Application (scheme of Arrangement) / Application for Directions to Convene Scheme Meeting
- Outcome
- Application granted (jurisdiction affirmed)
- Legal Topics
- Schemes of Arrangement, Class Composition, Shareholder Rights, Court Jurisdiction Under Companies Act 2006
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SABMiller plc
Applicant
Soroban Master Fund LP and Soroban Opportunities Master Fund LP
Intervener/objector
Altria Group, Inc.
Shareholder/interested Party
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Companies Court Application (scheme of Arrangement) / Application for Directions to Convene Scheme Meeting
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court has jurisdiction to order a scheme meeting of only some shareholders (excluding others who undertake to be bound) under sections 895 and 896 of the Companies Act 2006
- 2 Whether Altria and BEVCO must be included in the class meeting for the scheme of arrangement
Ratio Decidendi
The court has jurisdiction under sections 895 and 896 of the Companies Act 2006 to order a meeting of only some shareholders with whom a scheme is proposed, where others voluntarily undertake to be bound by the scheme and forgo their right to attend and vote at the meeting. There is no statutory or legal necessity to require all such shareholders to be summoned if they consent to exclusion.
Court Disposition
Application granted (jurisdiction affirmed)
Orders
- Court has jurisdiction to order a meeting of Public Shareholders excluding Altria and BEVCO, who may undertake to be bound by the scheme.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment