Ibrahim, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 1777 (04 December 2025)
The minimum term imposed was manifestly excessive because the aggravating factors did not outweigh the mitigating factors. The mitigating factors, including lack of premeditation, no intent to kill, and the appellant's young age, at least matched the aggravating factors. The minimum term should not have exceeded the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] EWCA Crim 1777
- Parties
- Respondent: Rex; Appellant: Saeed Ibrahim
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 December 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; minimum term reduced.
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Sentencing, Aggravating and Mitigating Factors, Minimum Term, Appeal Against Sentence
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Respondent
Saeed Ibrahim
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the minimum term of 15 years imposed for murder was manifestly excessive
- 2 Proper identification and weighting of aggravating and mitigating factors in sentencing
Ratio Decidendi
The minimum term imposed was manifestly excessive because the aggravating factors did not outweigh the mitigating factors. The mitigating factors, including lack of premeditation, no intent to kill, and the appellant's young age, at least matched the aggravating factors. The minimum term should not have exceeded the statutory starting point of 15 years, less time spent on remand.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; minimum term reduced.
Orders
- Minimum term reduced from 15 years to 14 years (after deduction of time spent on remand).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment