Kilmartin SCI (Hulton House) Ltd v Safeway Stores
The NIA of the premises, as constructed and measured at the date of practical completion, exceeded the minimum area required under the agreement. The disputed areas of the sloping area, basement ramp, and front plinths (excluding the small upper component) are included in NIA, while the areas occupied by the lifts and the adjoining area are excluded. The correct approach to the Code is that an area is usable if it can be used for any sensible purpose in connection with the purposes for which the premises are to be used, and the measurement is to be of the premises as constructed, including works required by the agreement. Accordingly, Kilmartin is entitled to specific performance.
- Parties
- Claimant: Kilmartin SCI (Hulton House) Ltd; Defendant: Safeway Stores
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 January 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim allowed; specific performance granted.
- Legal Topics
- Specific Performance, Lease Agreements, Measurement of Net Internal Area, Interpretation of Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kilmartin SCI (Hulton House) Ltd
Claimant
Safeway Stores
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Net Internal Area (NIA) of the premises as constructed met the minimum required under the agreement for lease, entitling the claimant to specific performance or the defendant to terminate the agreement.
- 2 Whether certain disputed areas (lifts, adjoining area, sloping area, basement ramp, front plinths) should be included or excluded from NIA under the RICS Code of Measuring Practice.
Ratio Decidendi
The NIA of the premises, as constructed and measured at the date of practical completion, exceeded the minimum area required under the agreement. The disputed areas of the sloping area, basement ramp, and front plinths (excluding the small upper component) are included in NIA, while the areas occupied by the lifts and the adjoining area are excluded. The correct approach to the Code is that an area is usable if it can be used for any sensible purpose in connection with the purposes for which the premises are to be used, and the measurement is to be of the premises as constructed, including works required by the agreement. Accordingly, Kilmartin is entitled to specific performance.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed; specific performance granted.
Orders
- Kilmartin's claim for specific performance of the agreement for lease is allowed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment