R v Sahil Arshad

R v Sahil Arshad

The sentence imposed was manifestly excessive due to insufficient consideration of the appellant's age, maturity, and circumstances of offending; the correct sentence is 12 months' detention in a young offender institution suspended for two years with requirements.

Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: Sahil Arshad
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
16 March 2026
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal allowed; sentence quashed and substituted
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Affray, Possession of Offensive Weapon, Youth Offenders, Parity in Sentencing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Sahil Arshad

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed on the appellant was manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Whether the sentencing court failed to adequately consider the appellant's age and maturity
  3. 3 Whether there was unlawful pronouncement of imprisonment instead of detention in a young offender institution

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence imposed was manifestly excessive due to insufficient consideration of the appellant's age, maturity, and circumstances of offending; the correct sentence is 12 months' detention in a young offender institution suspended for two years with requirements.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed; sentence quashed and substituted

Orders

  • Quash sentence for affray and substitute 12 months' detention in a young offender institution suspended for two years with 32 days rehabilitation activity and 160 hours unpaid work.
  • Correct sentence for possession of offensive weapon to detention in a young offender institution as previously sentenced.