Crown Prosecution Service v Shabbir & Ors [2009] EWHC 2754 (Admin) (21 October 2009)

Crown Prosecution Service v Shabbir & Ors [2009] EWHC 2754 (Admin) (21 October 2009)

The magistrates were wrong to acquit the defendants; lack of consent can be inferred from evidence such as CCTV, and violence does not preclude conviction under section 4 Public Order Act 1986.

Citation
[2009] EWHC 2754 (Admin)
Parties
Claimant: Crown Prosecution Service; Defendant: Sajid Shabbir; Defendant: Mohammed Khan; Defendant: Waheed Rathor; Defendant: Abdul Raffique
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 October 2009
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Common Assault, Public Order Offences, Consent in Assault, Criminal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Crown Prosecution Service

Claimant

Sajid Shabbir

Defendant

Mohammed Khan

Defendant

Waheed Rathor

Defendant

Abdul Raffique

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Is lack of consent a necessary ingredient of common assault or is consent a defence?
  2. 2 Can lack of consent be inferred from evidence other than victim testimony?
  3. 3 Does actual violence bar conviction under section 4 Public Order Act 1986?

Ratio Decidendi

The magistrates were wrong to acquit the defendants; lack of consent can be inferred from evidence such as CCTV, and violence does not preclude conviction under section 4 Public Order Act 1986.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • Acquittals set aside; defendants found guilty of offences under section 39 Criminal Justice Act 1988 and section 4 Public Order Act 1986.
  • Observations regarding legal representation to be drawn to appropriate authorities.