Pridmore & Ors, R (on the application of) v Salisbury District Council & Anor
Deliberate failure to comply with mandatory notification and certification requirements, coupled with false certificates and inadequate consideration of material facts, warrants exercise of discretion to quash the planning permission.
- Parties
- First Claimant: Ian Richard Pridmore; Second Claimant: Jo-Anne Louise Pridmore; Third Claimant: Terence George Dodd; Fourth Claimant: Linda Dodd; Defendant: Salisbury District Council; Interested Party: Bernard Docking
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 November 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment and Orders
- Outcome
- Application granted; planning permission quashed.
- Legal Topics
- Planning Permission, Procedural Irregularity, Statutory Notification, Judicial Review, Discretion to Quash
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ian Richard Pridmore
First Claimant
Jo-Anne Louise Pridmore
Second Claimant
Terence George Dodd
Third Claimant
Linda Dodd
Fourth Claimant
Salisbury District Council
Defendant
Bernard Docking
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether procedural irregularities in notification and certification render the planning permission voidable and warrant quashing
- 2 Whether the Council erred in law by entertaining and determining an invalid application
- 3 Whether the claimants suffered prejudice due to inadequate notice
Ratio Decidendi
Deliberate failure to comply with mandatory notification and certification requirements, coupled with false certificates and inadequate consideration of material facts, warrants exercise of discretion to quash the planning permission.
Court Disposition
Application granted; planning permission quashed.
Orders
- Planning permission granted to Bernard Docking is quashed.
- Defendant to pay claimants' costs, subject to detailed assessment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment