Hallam, R. v
The cumulative effect of unreliable identification evidence, undermined alibi, and fresh evidence not available at trial rendered the conviction unsafe.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: Sam Hallam
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 May 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- conviction quashed, appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Identification Evidence, Miscarriage of Justice, Fresh Evidence, Alibi, Disclosure Obligations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Sam Hallam
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction was safe given the reliability of identification evidence
- 2 Whether fresh evidence undermined the prosecution case
- 3 Whether failures in disclosure affected the fairness of the trial
Ratio Decidendi
The cumulative effect of unreliable identification evidence, undermined alibi, and fresh evidence not available at trial rendered the conviction unsafe.
Court Disposition
conviction quashed, appeal allowed
Orders
- No retrial ordered
- Full representation order granted for appellant's solicitor
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment