Manolete Partners Plc v Sampson Coward Llp [2023] EWHC 37 (Ch) (13 January 2023)

Manolete Partners Plc v Sampson Coward Llp [2023] EWHC 37 (Ch) (13 January 2023)

The issues of beneficial ownership of escrow monies, enforceability of undertakings against LLPs, and causation in relation to property transactions are fact-sensitive and/or involve developing law, making them unsuitable for summary judgment. The Claimant's case has a realistic prospect of success and should proceed to trial.

Citation
[2023] EWHC 37 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: Manolete Partners PLC; Defendant: Sampson Coward LLP
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
13 January 2023
Procedural Posture
Summary Judgment Application (cpr 24.2) in Civil Proceedings / Pre Defence, Summary Judgment Application Prior to Filing of Defence
Outcome
Summary judgment refused; Defendant directed to file and serve Defence.
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Solicitors' Undertakings, Escrow Accounts, Beneficial Ownership, Breach of Trust, Quistclose Trusts, Strike Out Applications, Conditional Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Manolete Partners PLC

Claimant

Sampson Coward LLP

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Summary Judgment Application (cpr 24.2) in Civil Proceedings / Pre Defence, Summary Judgment Application Prior to Filing of Defence

  1. 1 Whether the Claimant has a realistic prospect of success regarding beneficial ownership of monies in escrow accounts operated by the Defendant
  2. 2 Whether the Defendant's undertakings as an LLP are summarily enforceable under the court's inherent jurisdiction
  3. 3 Whether the claim relating to back-to-back property transactions discloses a sufficient causation case for summary judgment

Ratio Decidendi

The issues of beneficial ownership of escrow monies, enforceability of undertakings against LLPs, and causation in relation to property transactions are fact-sensitive and/or involve developing law, making them unsuitable for summary judgment. The Claimant's case has a realistic prospect of success and should proceed to trial.

Court Disposition

Summary judgment refused; Defendant directed to file and serve Defence.

Orders

  • Defendant to file and serve Defence within a time period to be fixed after judgment.
  • Costs and further consequential matters to be addressed after hearing counsel.