Manolete Partners Plc v Sampson Coward LLP

Manolete Partners Plc v Sampson Coward LLP

Summary judgment is inappropriate as the issues of beneficial ownership, enforceability of undertakings by LLPs, and causation in property transactions require fuller factual investigation at trial. The claim as amplified by the Reply case has a realistic prospect of success.

Parties
Claimant: Manolete Partners PLC; Defendant: Sampson Coward LLP
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
13 January 2023
Procedural Posture
Civil / Summary Judgment Application Prior to Defence
Outcome
Summary judgment application dismissed; directions given for filing and serving Defence.
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Solicitor's Undertakings, Escrow Accounts, Beneficial Ownership, Breach of Duty, Quistclose Trust, Causation
Civil Procedure Contract Law Trusts and Equity Summary Judgment Solicitor's Undertakings Escrow Accounts Beneficial Ownership Breach of Duty +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Manolete Partners PLC

Claimant

Sampson Coward LLP

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Summary Judgment Application Prior to Defence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether summary judgment should be granted on parts of the claim relating to escrow accounts
  2. 2 Whether the breach of undertaking claim against an LLP is summarily enforceable
  3. 3 Whether the claim relating to back-to-back property transactions discloses a clear causation case

Ratio Decidendi

Summary judgment is inappropriate as the issues of beneficial ownership, enforceability of undertakings by LLPs, and causation in property transactions require fuller factual investigation at trial. The claim as amplified by the Reply case has a realistic prospect of success.

Court Disposition

Summary judgment application dismissed; directions given for filing and serving Defence.

Orders

  • Defendant to file and serve Defence within a time period to be fixed after judgment.
  • Costs and consequential matters to be addressed after hearing counsel.