Browne-Morgan, R. v [2016] EWCA Crim 1903 (15 December 2016)
The sentencing judge was entitled to conclude, on the evidence, that the statutory conditions for a CBO were met and that the prohibitions (including those relating to association and area restrictions) were justified to prevent further offending, but the geographical prohibition required amendment for clarity and proportionality.
- Citation
- [2016] EWCA Crim 1903
- Parties
- Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Samuel Browne-Morgan
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Criminal Behaviour Order, Sentencing, Drug Offences, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Respondent
Samuel Browne-Morgan
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conditions for imposing a Criminal Behaviour Order (CBO) under section 22 of the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 were met
- 2 Whether the terms of the CBO, specifically prohibitions 2, 3, and 5, were justified and proportionate
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge was entitled to conclude, on the evidence, that the statutory conditions for a CBO were met and that the prohibitions (including those relating to association and area restrictions) were justified to prevent further offending, but the geographical prohibition required amendment for clarity and proportionality.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Prohibition 2 of the CBO is amended to prohibit the appellant from congregating in a public place in a group of two or more persons in a manner causing or likely to cause any person to fear for their safety; otherwise, the CBO stands as imposed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment