R v Samura Madhi & Anor
The sentence of 24 years' detention for Mahdi was manifestly excessive given his youth, mental health, low IQ, and vulnerability, which significantly outweighed the aggravating factors; a sentence of 18 years' detention was substituted. For Geravandian, the sentence of 24 years' imprisonment was not manifestly excessive given the aggravating factors and his role.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: Samura Mahdi; Appellant: Mohammed Amin Geravandian
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 May 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Attempted Murder, Sentencing, Youth Justice, Aggravating and Mitigating Factors, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Samura Mahdi
Appellant
Mohammed Amin Geravandian
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentences imposed on the appellants for attempted murder were manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether sufficient weight was given to the youth and vulnerabilities of the appellants
- 3 Whether the consecutive sentence for failing to disclose a PIN code was appropriate
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence of 24 years' detention for Mahdi was manifestly excessive given his youth, mental health, low IQ, and vulnerability, which significantly outweighed the aggravating factors; a sentence of 18 years' detention was substituted. For Geravandian, the sentence of 24 years' imprisonment was not manifestly excessive given the aggravating factors and his role.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Sentence of 24 years' detention for Mahdi on count 1 quashed and substituted with 18 years' detention under section 250 of the Sentencing Act 2020
- No separate penalty on count 3 for Mahdi
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment