Glaxo Wellcome UK Ltd (t/a Allen & Hanburys) & Anor v Sandoz Ltd & Ors
Special circumstances exist justifying permission for the second claimant to use the specified disclosed documents in the Belgian proceedings and for advice on potential new claims. The documents are likely to be relevant, the use is limited and justified, confidentiality can be maintained, and the interests of justice favour permitting use. The risk of injustice to the Sandoz Defendants is minimal and outweighed by the claimants' legitimate interests.
- Parties
- Claimant: Glaxo Wellcome UK Limited (t/a Allen & Hanburys); Claimant: Glaxo Group Limited; Defendant: Sandoz Limited; Defendant: Sandoz International GMBH; Defendant: Aeropharm GMBH; Defendant: Hexal AG; Defendant: Sandoz AG; Defendant: Vectura Group plc; Defendant: Vectura Delivery Devices Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Intellectual Property / Commercial / Interlocutory Application for Permission to Use Disclosed Documents in Foreign Proceedings
- Outcome
- Application granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Collateral Use of Disclosed Documents, Passing Off, Trade Marks, Confidentiality, Foreign Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Glaxo Wellcome UK Limited (t/a Allen & Hanburys)
Claimant
Glaxo Group Limited
Claimant
Sandoz Limited
Defendant
Sandoz International GMBH
Defendant
Aeropharm GMBH
Defendant
Hexal AG
Defendant
Sandoz AG
Defendant
Vectura Group plc
Defendant
Vectura Delivery Devices Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Intellectual Property / Commercial / Interlocutory Application for Permission to Use Disclosed Documents in Foreign Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the second claimant should be permitted to use documents disclosed in these proceedings for the purposes of litigation in Belgium and potential new actions in Belgium against additional parties
- 2 Whether the documents are likely to be relevant to the Belgian proceedings and/or advice on new claims
- 3 Whether special circumstances exist justifying release from the implied undertaking under CPR 31.22(1)(b)
Ratio Decidendi
Special circumstances exist justifying permission for the second claimant to use the specified disclosed documents in the Belgian proceedings and for advice on potential new claims. The documents are likely to be relevant, the use is limited and justified, confidentiality can be maintained, and the interests of justice favour permitting use. The risk of injustice to the Sandoz Defendants is minimal and outweighed by the claimants' legitimate interests.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part
Orders
- Permission granted to the second claimant to use the redacted documents (excluding specified documents) included in the two document bundles produced on 2 November 2018 for the purposes of the Belgian proceedings and advice on potential new claims.
- Confidentiality regime to be maintained as agreed between the parties.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment