Glaxo Wellcome UK Ltd (t/a Allen & Hanburys) & Anor v Sandoz Ltd & Ors [2018] EWHC 3229 (Ch) (30 November 2018)
Special circumstances exist justifying permission for collateral use of disclosed documents in Belgian proceedings; the documents are likely to be relevant, the parties are substantial and equally resourced, confidentiality is adequately protected, and the interests of justice favour the claimants.
- Citation
- [2018] EWHC 3229 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Glaxo Wellcome UK Limited (t/a Allen & Hanburys); Claimant: Glaxo Group Limited; Defendant: Sandoz Limited; Defendant: Sandoz International GMBH; Defendant: Aeropharm GMBH; Defendant: Hexal AG; Defendant: Sandoz AG; Defendant: Vectura Group plc; Defendant: Vectura Delivery Devices Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Permission to Use Disclosed Documents in Foreign Proceedings / Interlocutory Application, Pre Trial
- Outcome
- Application granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure of Documents, Passing Off, Trade Marks, Collateral Use of Documents, Confidentiality, Foreign Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Glaxo Wellcome UK Limited (t/a Allen & Hanburys)
Claimant
Glaxo Group Limited
Claimant
Sandoz Limited
Defendant
Sandoz International GMBH
Defendant
Aeropharm GMBH
Defendant
Hexal AG
Defendant
Sandoz AG
Defendant
Vectura Group plc
Defendant
Vectura Delivery Devices Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Permission to Use Disclosed Documents in Foreign Proceedings / Interlocutory Application, Pre Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission should be granted under CPR 31.22(1)(b) to use documents disclosed in English proceedings in related Belgian litigation
- 2 Relevance of disclosed documents to Belgian claim and potential new actions
- 3 Balancing interests of justice between parties
Ratio Decidendi
Special circumstances exist justifying permission for collateral use of disclosed documents in Belgian proceedings; the documents are likely to be relevant, the parties are substantial and equally resourced, confidentiality is adequately protected, and the interests of justice favour the claimants.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part
Orders
- Permission granted to second claimant to use redacted documents in Belgian proceedings and for legal advice, except for documents with exhibit numbers 58, 60, 99, 152, 162, 164, 165, 169.
- Order for confidentiality club regime to be maintained.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment