Glaxo Wellcome UK Ltd (t/a Allen & Hanburys) & Anor v Sandoz Ltd & Ors
The survey evidence is not so flawed or disproportionate in cost as to warrant exclusion at this stage; the evidence may be of real value to the court in assessing distinctiveness and should be admitted for trial.
- Parties
- Claimant: Glaxo Wellcome UK Limited (T/A Allen & Hanburys); Claimant: Glaxo Group Limited; Defendant: Sandoz Limited; Defendant: Sandoz International GmbH; Defendant: Aeropharm GmbH; Defendant: Hexal AG
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Passing Off / Interlocutory Application for Permission to Adduce Survey Evidence
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Passing Off, Trade Mark Distinctiveness, Survey Evidence Admissibility
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Glaxo Wellcome UK Limited (T/A Allen & Hanburys)
Claimant
Glaxo Group Limited
Claimant
Sandoz Limited
Defendant
Sandoz International GmbH
Defendant
Aeropharm GmbH
Defendant
Hexal AG
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Passing Off / Interlocutory Application for Permission to Adduce Survey Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether survey evidence on colour distinctiveness should be admitted in passing off proceedings
- 2 Whether the surveys are of real value and justify the cost
- 3 Whether the surveys are adequately documented and methodologically sound
Ratio Decidendi
The survey evidence is not so flawed or disproportionate in cost as to warrant exclusion at this stage; the evidence may be of real value to the court in assessing distinctiveness and should be admitted for trial.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- Permission granted to claimants to adduce survey evidence in passing off proceedings
- Parties to engage in further case management to clarify evidence and witnesses
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment