Hussain, R. v [2024] EWCA Crim 228 (14 February 2024)
The judge's directions sufficiently guarded against the risk of the jury convicting solely on the basis of a rejected alibi. The route to verdict required the jury to be sure of identification and the elements of the offence, not merely the falsity of the alibi. A lies direction was not required in the circumstances, and the conviction was safe given the cogent evidence against the appellant.
- Citation
- [2024] EWCA Crim 228
- Parties
- Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Saquab Hussain
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Rape, Alibi, Jury Directions, Lucas Direction, Sexual Offences, Appeals
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Respondent
Saquab Hussain
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge failed to properly direct the jury regarding the approach to a rejected alibi and the necessity of a Lucas (lies) direction.
Ratio Decidendi
The judge's directions sufficiently guarded against the risk of the jury convicting solely on the basis of a rejected alibi. The route to verdict required the jury to be sure of identification and the elements of the offence, not merely the falsity of the alibi. A lies direction was not required in the circumstances, and the conviction was safe given the cogent evidence against the appellant.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment