Thornton, R. v [1995] EWCA Crim 6 (13 December 1995)
Fresh medical evidence and clarification of the law regarding relevant characteristics for provocation cast doubt on the safety of the jury's verdict; the jury was not properly directed to consider the appellant's personality disorder and battered woman syndrome as relevant characteristics. The conviction is unsafe and must be quashed.
- Citation
- [1995] EWCA Crim 6
- Parties
- Appellant: Sara Thornton; Deceased: Malcolm Thornton; Referrer: Secretary of State; Respondent: Crown
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Post Conviction, Referred Under Section 17 Criminal Appeal Act 1968
- Outcome
- conviction quashed, retrial ordered
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Manslaughter, Provocation, Diminished Responsibility, Battered Woman Syndrome, Fresh Evidence, Jury Directions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sara Thornton
Appellant
Malcolm Thornton
Deceased
Secretary of State
Referrer
Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Post Conviction, Referred Under Section 17 Criminal Appeal Act 1968
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant's conviction for murder is safe given fresh medical evidence and developments in the law of provocation
- 2 Whether the jury was properly directed on the relevance of the appellant's characteristics to the defence of provocation
- 3 Whether a retrial is appropriate
Ratio Decidendi
Fresh medical evidence and clarification of the law regarding relevant characteristics for provocation cast doubt on the safety of the jury's verdict; the jury was not properly directed to consider the appellant's personality disorder and battered woman syndrome as relevant characteristics. The conviction is unsafe and must be quashed.
Court Disposition
conviction quashed, retrial ordered
Orders
- Conviction quashed
- Retrial ordered at Birmingham Crown Court within two months
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment