Andrew Morris Jenkins & Anor v Sarah Caroline Ingham Evans

Andrew Morris Jenkins & Anor v Sarah Caroline Ingham Evans

The 2017 Will is valid as the Testator had testamentary capacity, knew and approved its contents, and was not subject to undue influence. The evidence of the solicitor, medical records, and rationality of the Will outweigh the defendant’s objections. The golden rule was not observed but is not determinative. The Testator’s change of executorship was rational given the breakdown between his children. Sally’s Will Trust holds an equitable charge, not a beneficial interest, in Simon’s Hollow.

Parties
Claimant: Andrew Morris Jenkins; Claimant: Jennifer Joy Vooght; Defendant: Sarah Caroline Ingham Evans
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
10 March 2025
Procedural Posture
Probate Claim / Final Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Claim succeeds; 2017 Will pronounced valid; counterclaim dismissed.
Legal Topics
Testamentary Capacity, Knowledge and Approval, Undue Influence, Executorship, Equitable Charge, Golden Rule
Probate Trusts Property Testamentary Capacity Knowledge and Approval Undue Influence Executorship Equitable Charge +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 23 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Andrew Morris Jenkins

Claimant

Jennifer Joy Vooght

Claimant

Sarah Caroline Ingham Evans

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Probate Claim / Final Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the 2017 Will of Robert Glyn Evans is valid
  2. 2 Whether the Testator had testamentary capacity
  3. 3 Whether the Testator knew and approved the contents of the 2017 Will

Ratio Decidendi

The 2017 Will is valid as the Testator had testamentary capacity, knew and approved its contents, and was not subject to undue influence. The evidence of the solicitor, medical records, and rationality of the Will outweigh the defendant’s objections. The golden rule was not observed but is not determinative. The Testator’s change of executorship was rational given the breakdown between his children. Sally’s Will Trust holds an equitable charge, not a beneficial interest, in Simon’s Hollow.

Court Disposition

Claim succeeds; 2017 Will pronounced valid; counterclaim dismissed.

Orders

  • Pronouncement in solemn form of the 2017 Will dated 31 March 2017
  • Caroline’s caveat to cease to have effect