Al-Baker v Al-Baker
The respondent was validly served with disclosure orders and committal application by email, failed to comply with disclosure orders without good excuse, and is sentenced to nine months' imprisonment for contempt.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Sarah Kimura Al-Baker; Respondent: Abdul Amir Al-Baker
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 October 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Committal Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- application granted
- Legal Topics
- Committal for Contempt, Disclosure Orders, Service Out of Jurisdiction, Ancillary Relief
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sarah Kimura Al-Baker
Applicant
Abdul Amir Al-Baker
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Committal Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent breached disclosure orders
- 2 Whether service of committal application was valid
- 3 Whether dispensation with personal service and abridgement of time was justified
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent was validly served with disclosure orders and committal application by email, failed to comply with disclosure orders without good excuse, and is sentenced to nine months' imprisonment for contempt.
Court Disposition
application granted
Orders
- Respondent committed to prison for nine months for contempt of court.
- Respondent may apply to purge his contempt.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment