SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1482 (21 November 2013)

SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1482 (21 November 2013)

Replication of software functionality and use of manuals as technical specification do not constitute copyright infringement, as copyright protects only the expression of intellectual creation, not ideas, functionality, or combinations/selections dictated by technical function. The elements copied by WPL from SAS Manuals were not the form of expression of the intellectual creation of the authors of the manuals and thus not protected.

Citation
[2013] EWCA Civ 1482
Parties
Appellant: SAS Institute Inc; Respondent: World Programming Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 November 2013
Procedural Posture
Copyright Infringement and Breach of Contract / Appeal From High Court, Chancery Division
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Copyright Protection of Software Functionality, Expression Vs Ideas, Scope of Copyright in Manuals, European Directives Harmonisation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SAS Institute Inc

Appellant

World Programming Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Copyright Infringement and Breach of Contract / Appeal From High Court, Chancery Division

  1. 1 Whether replication of software functionality infringes copyright
  2. 2 Whether use of manuals as technical specification constitutes copyright infringement
  3. 3 Whether copying combinations and selections from manuals is protected

Ratio Decidendi

Replication of software functionality and use of manuals as technical specification do not constitute copyright infringement, as copyright protects only the expression of intellectual creation, not ideas, functionality, or combinations/selections dictated by technical function. The elements copied by WPL from SAS Manuals were not the form of expression of the intellectual creation of the authors of the manuals and thus not protected.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • No copyright infringement found in replication of software functionality or use of SAS Manuals as technical specification
  • Limited breaches of copyright in Manual to Manual claim upheld