Société Africaine de Raffinage v Savannah SA
No real risk of substantial obstacles to enforcement or material additional burden in Senegal was demonstrated; therefore, the application for security for costs fails and is dismissed.
- Parties
- Claimant: Societe Africaine de Raffinage; Defendant: Savannah SA
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Claim / Application for Security for Costs and Extension of Time to File Defence
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Enforcement of Foreign Judgments, Set Off, Case Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Parties
Societe Africaine de Raffinage
Claimant
Savannah SA
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Claim / Application for Security for Costs and Extension of Time to File Defence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Savannah SA is entitled to security for costs from Societe Africaine de Raffinage
- 2 Whether there is a real risk of substantial obstacles to enforcement of an English costs order in Senegal
- 3 Whether an extension of time to file defence should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
No real risk of substantial obstacles to enforcement or material additional burden in Senegal was demonstrated; therefore, the application for security for costs fails and is dismissed.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- Claimant to file and serve amended particulars of claim by 4 p.m. on Monday, striking through para.20, para.21 and the first sentence of para.22, without prejudice to repleading in reply if material.
- Defendant to file and serve defence by 4 p.m. on Monday 4 March 2024.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment