Savic v ICO & Ors
The public interest in maintaining the confidentiality of instructions for and legal advice relating to an issue of particular complexity, sensitivity, and constitutional importance outweighs the public interest in disclosure, especially given ongoing or potential litigation and the continuing relevance of the exemptions under sections 35(1)(c) and 42(1) of FOIA.
- Parties
- Appellant: Savic; First Respondent: Information Commissioner's Office (ICO); Second Respondent: Attorney General's Office (AGO); Third Respondent: Cabinet Office (CO)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 2016
- Procedural Posture
- FOIA Appeal / Upper Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Information Act 2000, Legal Professional Privilege, Law Officers’ Advice, International Relations Exemption
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Savic
Appellant
Information Commissioner's Office (ICO)
First Respondent
Attorney General's Office (AGO)
Second Respondent
Cabinet Office (CO)
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
FOIA Appeal / Upper Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the exemptions under sections 35(1)(c), 42(1), and 27(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 apply to the requested information
- 2 Whether the public interest in disclosure outweighs the public interest in maintaining the exemptions
Ratio Decidendi
The public interest in maintaining the confidentiality of instructions for and legal advice relating to an issue of particular complexity, sensitivity, and constitutional importance outweighs the public interest in disclosure, especially given ongoing or potential litigation and the continuing relevance of the exemptions under sections 35(1)(c) and 42(1) of FOIA.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeals against the AGO Decision and the CO Decision (insofar as it relates to the s. 42 document) are dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment