Bukhari v Pow Trust & Ors
The CRO must be reinstated because the discharge was obtained by misleading the court, omitting material facts about prior applications found totally without merit, and failing to serve proper notice to the Applicant. The Respondents' applications were repeatedly found to be totally without merit, satisfying the requirements for a CRO under Practice Direction 3C.
- Parties
- Applicant: Sayed Bukhari; Respondent: POW Trust; Respondent: Peter Sainsbury; Respondent: John McVicar; Respondent: Angelo Silva
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 January 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application to Reinstate Civil Restraint Order
- Outcome
- Civil Restraint Order reinstated
- Legal Topics
- Civil Restraint Orders, Possession Proceedings, Abuse of Process, Court Orders, Practice Direction 3 C
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sayed Bukhari
Applicant
POW Trust
Respondent
Peter Sainsbury
Respondent
John McVicar
Respondent
Angelo Silva
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application to Reinstate Civil Restraint Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Civil Restraint Order (CRO) should be reinstated
- 2 Whether previous applications were totally without merit
- 3 Whether the court was misled in setting aside the CRO
Ratio Decidendi
The CRO must be reinstated because the discharge was obtained by misleading the court, omitting material facts about prior applications found totally without merit, and failing to serve proper notice to the Applicant. The Respondents' applications were repeatedly found to be totally without merit, satisfying the requirements for a CRO under Practice Direction 3C.
Court Disposition
Civil Restraint Order reinstated
Orders
- The Civil Restraint Order (CRO) is reinstated against POW Trust, Peter Sainsbury, John McVicar, and Angelo Silva.
- Applications by Mr Sainsbury (for POW Trust) to discharge the CRO are declared totally without merit.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment