SC, R. v

SC, R. v

The judge was entitled to reject the submission of no case to answer on both counts, as the cumulative evidence, including BBM messages and conduct, established the appellant's participation in the conspiracy. The admission of bad character evidence was properly within the judge's discretion and did not render the conviction unsafe.

Parties
Appellant: SC; Respondent: Regina
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
15 March 2016
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Conspiracy, Robbery, Handling Stolen Goods, Bad Character Evidence, Gang Violence
Criminal Law Conspiracy Robbery Handling Stolen Goods Bad Character Evidence Gang Violence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SC

Appellant

Regina

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in rejecting the submission of no case to answer on conspiracy to rob and conspiracy to cause grievous bodily harm
  2. 2 Whether the admission of bad character evidence rendered the conviction unsafe

Ratio Decidendi

The judge was entitled to reject the submission of no case to answer on both counts, as the cumulative evidence, including BBM messages and conduct, established the appellant's participation in the conspiracy. The admission of bad character evidence was properly within the judge's discretion and did not render the conviction unsafe.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • conviction upheld