Nutrinova Nutrition Specialities & Food Ingredients + Ors v. Scanchem UK Ltd [2000] EWHC Patents 124 (17th March, 2000)
The specification was framed in good faith and with reasonable skill and knowledge; amendment by deletion of invalid claims is allowed as there is no bad faith or exceptional circumstance; a narrower injunction is appropriate as the defendant is not a willing infringer; disclosure of purchasers is refused at this stage due to absence of bad faith and pending appeal; costs are apportioned to reflect partial success on validity and amendment of infringement case, with an interim payment ordered in instalments not exceeding £150,000.
- Citation
- [2000] EWHC Patents 124
- Parties
- Claimant: Nutrinova Nutrition Specialties & Food Ingredients GmbH; Claimant: Nutrinova UK Limited; Defendant: Scanchem UK Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Procedural Posture
- Patent Infringement and Validity Proceedings / Post Trial Judgment on Form of Order, Costs, Amendment, and Injunctive Relief
- Outcome
- Patent held partially valid and infringed; amendment by deletion of invalid claims allowed; narrower injunction granted; disclosure of purchasers refused at this stage; costs apportioned; interim payment of costs ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Patent Validity, Patent Infringement, Amendment of Patent Claims, Injunctive Relief, Costs and Interim Payments, Disclosure of Purchasers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nutrinova Nutrition Specialties & Food Ingredients GmbH
Claimant
Nutrinova UK Limited
Claimant
Scanchem UK Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Patent Infringement and Validity Proceedings / Post Trial Judgment on Form of Order, Costs, Amendment, and Injunctive Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the patent specification was framed in good faith and with reasonable skill and knowledge for the purposes of damages and costs under Patents Act 1977 s.63(2)
- 2 Whether amendment by deletion of invalid claims should be allowed
- 3 Form and scope of injunctive relief for patent infringement
Ratio Decidendi
The specification was framed in good faith and with reasonable skill and knowledge; amendment by deletion of invalid claims is allowed as there is no bad faith or exceptional circumstance; a narrower injunction is appropriate as the defendant is not a willing infringer; disclosure of purchasers is refused at this stage due to absence of bad faith and pending appeal; costs are apportioned to reflect partial success on validity and amendment of infringement case, with an interim payment ordered in instalments not exceeding £150,000.
Court Disposition
Patent held partially valid and infringed; amendment by deletion of invalid claims allowed; narrower injunction granted; disclosure of purchasers refused at this stage; costs apportioned; interim payment of costs ordered.
Orders
- Amendment of patent by deletion of invalid claims allowed
- Injunction against importing acesulphame K from Beijing Vitasweet granted, with liberty to apply
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment