SCC v FP & Ors.
It is contrary to FP’s best interests for face to face contact with RT to continue for an interim period due to RT’s entrenched, irrational beliefs and conduct, which have a demonstrably negative impact on FP’s mental health, autonomy, and care; indirect contact is to be strictly limited and supervised.
- Parties
- Applicant: SCC; First Respondent: FP (By her Litigation Friend, NS); Second Respondent: RT; Third Respondent: ST
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Welfare Application Under Mental Capacity Act / Final Judgment After Contested Hearing
- Outcome
- Application granted; contact restricted; injunctive relief continued.
- Legal Topics
- Best Interests, Contact Restrictions, Privacy, Court of Protection Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SCC
Applicant
FP (By her Litigation Friend, NS)
First Respondent
RT
Second Respondent
ST
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Welfare Application Under Mental Capacity Act / Final Judgment After Contested Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether it is in FP’s best interests to restrict direct and indirect contact with her mother RT
- 2 Whether FP has regained capacity to make decisions about residence, care, and contact
- 3 Whether RT’s conduct justifies injunctive relief and restrictions on communication
Ratio Decidendi
It is contrary to FP’s best interests for face to face contact with RT to continue for an interim period due to RT’s entrenched, irrational beliefs and conduct, which have a demonstrably negative impact on FP’s mental health, autonomy, and care; indirect contact is to be strictly limited and supervised.
Court Disposition
Application granted; contact restricted; injunctive relief continued.
Orders
- No face to face contact between FP and RT for at least five months.
- Indirect contact limited to one supervised telephone call every fortnight for up to 30 minutes.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment