Khilji v Mehers & Anor [2025] EWHC 548 (Ch) (11 March 2025)
The appellant did not inform the trustee or official receiver of her beneficial interest in the property within three months of bankruptcy, nor did the trustee become aware of such interest before 11 January 2019; actual knowledge, not constructive knowledge, is required under s283A(5) Insolvency Act 1986. The trustee's possession claim was made within the relevant three-year period and stopped the clock, preventing revesting of the property interest.
- Citation
- [2025] EWHC 548 (Ch)
- Parties
- Appellant: Scherzade Khilji; First Respondent (trustee in Bankruptcy): Amy Mehers; Second Respondent (administrator of Deceased's Estate): David George Hartwell
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 March 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Chancery Appeal / Appeal From Order of Deputy ICC Judge Curl KC Dated 2 March 2023
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Bankruptcy Trustee's Powers, Revesting of Property, Common Intention Constructive Trust, Interpretation of S283 a Insolvency Act 1986
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Scherzade Khilji
Appellant
Amy Mehers
First Respondent (trustee in Bankruptcy)
David George Hartwell
Second Respondent (administrator of Deceased's Estate)
Procedural Posture
Chancery Appeal / Appeal From Order of Deputy ICC Judge Curl KC Dated 2 March 2023
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the three-year period under s283A Insolvency Act 1986 was exceeded
- 2 Proper construction of 'informed' and 'become aware' under s283A(5)
- 3 Whether the appellant's beneficial interest in property revested
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant did not inform the trustee or official receiver of her beneficial interest in the property within three months of bankruptcy, nor did the trustee become aware of such interest before 11 January 2019; actual knowledge, not constructive knowledge, is required under s283A(5) Insolvency Act 1986. The trustee's possession claim was made within the relevant three-year period and stopped the clock, preventing revesting of the property interest.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed on all grounds
- Parties to agree consequential matters and costs; if not, further hearing to be held within 28 days
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment