M, R (on the application of) v Independent Appeal Panel & Ors

M, R (on the application of) v Independent Appeal Panel & Ors

No ground for judicial review is made out; the Panel's decision was lawful, fair, and based on sufficient evidence, and the correct procedural and evidential standards were applied.

Parties
Claimant: M, proceeding by his mother and litigation friend A; First Defendant: Independent Appeal Panel; Second Defendant: Governing Body of CH School; Third Defendant: Head Teacher of CH School
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
27 July 2004
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Outcome
application for judicial review refused
Legal Topics
School Discipline, Exclusion, Judicial Review, Standard of Proof, Procedural Fairness
Administrative Law Education Law School Discipline Exclusion Judicial Review Standard of Proof Procedural Fairness

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

M, proceeding by his mother and litigation friend A

Claimant

Independent Appeal Panel

First Defendant

Governing Body of CH School

Second Defendant

Head Teacher of CH School

Third Defendant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Independent Appeal Panel's decision to uphold permanent exclusion was unlawful
  2. 2 Whether duress invalidated the claimant's confession
  3. 3 Whether absence of a witness (Mr Zweistra) rendered proceedings unfair

Ratio Decidendi

No ground for judicial review is made out; the Panel's decision was lawful, fair, and based on sufficient evidence, and the correct procedural and evidential standards were applied.

Court Disposition

application for judicial review refused