Barclays Bank PLC v Dylan & Ors [2024] EWHC 74 (Ch) (17 January 2024)
The hearing is adjourned because proceeding as scheduled would be impractical and unjust given Mr Dylan's medical situation and the respondents' lack of adequate professional representation.
- Citation
- [2024] EWHC 74 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Barclays Bank Plc; Defendant: Scott Dylan; Defendant: Gareth Dylan; Defendant: Sally Ann Glover; Defendant: David Antrobus; Defendant: OLD3 LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION); Defendant: Jack Mason; Defendant: OLD2 LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 January 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Committal Application / Interlocutory Adjournment
- Outcome
- hearing adjourned
- Legal Topics
- Adjournment, Committal Proceedings, Medical Grounds, Representation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Barclays Bank Plc
Claimant
Scott Dylan
Defendant
Gareth Dylan
Defendant
Sally Ann Glover
Defendant
David Antrobus
Defendant
OLD3 LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION)
Defendant
Jack Mason
Defendant
OLD2 LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION)
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Committal Application / Interlocutory Adjournment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to adjourn the substantive committal hearing due to medical grounds and lack of representation
Ratio Decidendi
The hearing is adjourned because proceeding as scheduled would be impractical and unjust given Mr Dylan's medical situation and the respondents' lack of adequate professional representation.
Court Disposition
hearing adjourned
Orders
- Committal hearing adjourned from existing slot.
- Directions hearing scheduled for next week to address consequential matters, timing, and Mr Dylan's medical situation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment