R v Scott Garrington

R v Scott Garrington

The prosecution adduced sufficient evidence, including identification and circumstantial evidence, upon which a reasonable jury could properly convict the appellant. The judge was correct to reject the submission of no case to answer and leave the case to the jury.

Parties
Respondent: Rex; Appellant: Scott Garrington
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
29 January 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; conviction upheld.
Legal Topics
Identification Evidence, Joint Enterprise, Submission of No Case to Answer, Circumstantial Evidence
Criminal Law Identification Evidence Joint Enterprise Submission of No Case to Answer Circumstantial Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Respondent

Scott Garrington

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the identification evidence was sufficient to establish the appellant as P3
  2. 2 Whether there was a case to answer based on the evidence presented
  3. 3 Whether the appellant was involved in the joint enterprise alleged against the co-defendants

Ratio Decidendi

The prosecution adduced sufficient evidence, including identification and circumstantial evidence, upon which a reasonable jury could properly convict the appellant. The judge was correct to reject the submission of no case to answer and leave the case to the jury.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; conviction upheld.

Orders

  • The appeal against conviction is dismissed.