Reid, R v [2009] EWCA Crim 2135 (06 October 2009)
Given the seriousness of the planned and sustained attack on a vulnerable victim, a notional determinate sentence of 14 years, with a minimum term of seven years for imprisonment for public protection, was not manifestly excessive and adequately reflected the aggravating features and the timing of the guilty plea.
- Citation
- [2009] EWCA Crim 2135
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: Scott Reid
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 October 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Wounding With Intent, Imprisonment for Public Protection, Sentencing, Dangerous Offender, Discount for Guilty Plea
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Scott Reid
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the minimum term of seven years' imprisonment for public protection was manifestly excessive for a section 18 wounding with intent conviction.
Ratio Decidendi
Given the seriousness of the planned and sustained attack on a vulnerable victim, a notional determinate sentence of 14 years, with a minimum term of seven years for imprisonment for public protection, was not manifestly excessive and adequately reflected the aggravating features and the timing of the guilty plea.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The specified minimum term of seven years' imprisonment is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment