House of Fraser Ltd v Scottish Widows Plc [2011] EWHC 2800 (Ch) (28 October 2011)
Permission to appeal was refused because none of the alleged errors constituted questions of law fairly and squarely put before the arbitrator; all issues raised were factual determinations within the arbitrator's remit and not open to challenge under section 69 Arbitration Act 1996.
- Citation
- [2011] EWHC 2800 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: House of Fraser Ltd; Defendant: Scottish Widows Plc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 October 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Permission to Appeal Under Section 69 Arbitration Act 1996 / Oral Hearing of Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Rent Review, Appeal on Point of Law, Arbitration Award Challenge, Lease Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
House of Fraser Ltd
Claimant
Scottish Widows Plc
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Permission to Appeal Under Section 69 Arbitration Act 1996 / Oral Hearing of Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arbitrator was entitled to have regard to post-review date hindsight evidence
- 2 Whether the arbitrator could take into account speculative assumptions about the actions of the actual tenant when determining hypothetical lessee approach
- 3 Whether the arbitrator could rely on unfounded speculative findings about the actual lessee's position
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal was refused because none of the alleged errors constituted questions of law fairly and squarely put before the arbitrator; all issues raised were factual determinations within the arbitrator's remit and not open to challenge under section 69 Arbitration Act 1996.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment