House of Fraser Ltd v Scottish Widows Plc
Permission to appeal was refused because none of the alleged legal issues were fairly and squarely put before the arbitrator, the arbitrator's findings were factual, not legal errors, and the statutory requirements under section 69(3) were not satisfied.
- Parties
- Claimant: House of Fraser Ltd; Defendant: Scottish Widows Plc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 October 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Arbitration Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal Under Section 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Rent Review, Appeal on Point of Law, Arbitration Act 1996 Section 69, Lease Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
House of Fraser Ltd
Claimant
Scottish Widows Plc
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Arbitration Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal Under Section 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arbitrator was entitled to have regard to post-review date hindsight evidence
- 2 Whether the arbitrator could take into account speculative assumptions about the actions of the actual tenant when the lease was granted
- 3 Whether the arbitrator could rely on unfounded speculative findings about the position of the actual lessee in 2009
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal was refused because none of the alleged legal issues were fairly and squarely put before the arbitrator, the arbitrator's findings were factual, not legal errors, and the statutory requirements under section 69(3) were not satisfied.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal refused.
Orders
- Permission to appeal under section 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996 is refused.
- Submissions to be heard on consequential orders.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment