Fit Kitchen Ltd & Anor v Scratch Meals Ltd
The trade mark was not registered in bad faith as the applicant did not know the company was dissolved at the time of application; restoration under s.1028(1) of the Companies Act validated the application. The defendant's use of FIT KITCHEN infringed the trade mark under s.10(2) due to likelihood of confusion, but not under s.10(3) due to lack of reputation. The claimants established goodwill and misrepresentation, making out passing off.
- Parties
- Claimant: Fit Kitchen Limited; Claimant: Amar Lodhia; Defendant: Scratch Meals Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 July 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Intellectual Property / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim for trade mark infringement under s.10(2) and passing off succeeds; claim under s.10(3) fails; counterclaim for invalidity fails.
- Legal Topics
- Trade Mark Infringement, Passing Off, Bad Faith Registration, Company Dissolution, Restoration of Companies
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fit Kitchen Limited
Claimant
Amar Lodhia
Claimant
Scratch Meals Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Intellectual Property / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trade mark registration was made in bad faith
- 2 Whether the trade mark was valid given company dissolution
- 3 Whether the defendant infringed the trade mark under s.10(2) and s.10(3) of the Trade Marks Act
Ratio Decidendi
The trade mark was not registered in bad faith as the applicant did not know the company was dissolved at the time of application; restoration under s.1028(1) of the Companies Act validated the application. The defendant's use of FIT KITCHEN infringed the trade mark under s.10(2) due to likelihood of confusion, but not under s.10(3) due to lack of reputation. The claimants established goodwill and misrepresentation, making out passing off.
Court Disposition
Claim for trade mark infringement under s.10(2) and passing off succeeds; claim under s.10(3) fails; counterclaim for invalidity fails.
Orders
- Declaration of trade mark infringement under s.10(2)
- Declaration of passing off
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment