Sean McAteer v The Information Commissioner & Anor
Confirming or denying whether the requested information is held would disclose personal data of identifiable individuals, and is not reasonably necessary for the legitimate interest of preventing fraud or misuse of funds, as less intrusive means exist. The exemption under s 40(5B) FOIA applies and the appeal is dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Sean McAteer; First Respondent: The Information Commissioner; Second Respondent: The Legal Services Agency Northern Ireland
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 December 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Information Rights Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Information, Personal Data, Public Interest, Legal Aid Fraud
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sean McAteer
Appellant
The Information Commissioner
First Respondent
The Legal Services Agency Northern Ireland
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Information Rights Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether confirming or denying the existence of requested information would disclose personal data under s 40(5B) FOIA
- 2 Whether the appellant is pursuing a legitimate interest
- 3 Whether confirmation or denial is necessary for the legitimate interest
Ratio Decidendi
Confirming or denying whether the requested information is held would disclose personal data of identifiable individuals, and is not reasonably necessary for the legitimate interest of preventing fraud or misuse of funds, as less intrusive means exist. The exemption under s 40(5B) FOIA applies and the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment