Singh v The Charity Commission & Ors [2016] EWHC B33 (Ch) (22 December 2016)
Permission to discontinue proceedings is refused with immediate effect because claimants' conduct was found to be evasive and tactical, the Charity Commission's refusal was procured by claimants' withdrawal of their request and incomplete information, and justice requires that defendants be given a time-limited opportunity to take over the proceedings by filing a counterclaim and seeking authorisation from the Charity Commission. The interim injunction and stay remain in place for a limited period to allow this.
- Citation
- [2016] EWHC B33 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: C1 (President of the Committee); Claimant: C2 (General Secretary of the Committee); Defendant: Second Defendant (Trustee); Defendant: Third Defendant (Trustee); Defendant: Fourth Defendant (Trustee); Defendant: Charity Commission (CC); Defendant: Attorney-General (A-G)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Charity Proceedings (internal Dispute) / Application for Permission to Discontinue Claim; Interim Injunction and Stay in Place
- Outcome
- Application for permission to discontinue refused; proceedings not discontinued immediately.
- Legal Topics
- Charity Proceedings Authorisation, Interim Injunctions, Discontinuance of Proceedings, Consent Orders, Abuse of Process, Trustee Duties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
C1 (President of the Committee)
Claimant
C2 (General Secretary of the Committee)
Claimant
Second Defendant (Trustee)
Defendant
Third Defendant (Trustee)
Defendant
Fourth Defendant (Trustee)
Defendant
Charity Commission (CC)
Defendant
Attorney-General (A-G)
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Charity Proceedings (internal Dispute) / Application for Permission to Discontinue Claim; Interim Injunction and Stay in Place
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimants should be granted permission to discontinue proceedings under CPR 38.2(2)(a)
- 2 Whether the interim injunction/consent order should remain in force
- 3 Whether the Charity Commission's refusal to authorise proceedings is determinative
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to discontinue proceedings is refused with immediate effect because claimants' conduct was found to be evasive and tactical, the Charity Commission's refusal was procured by claimants' withdrawal of their request and incomplete information, and justice requires that defendants be given a time-limited opportunity to take over the proceedings by filing a counterclaim and seeking authorisation from the Charity Commission. The interim injunction and stay remain in place for a limited period to allow this.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to discontinue refused; proceedings not discontinued immediately.
Orders
- Defendants to serve and file a counterclaim and apply to the Charity Commission for authorisation within four weeks (by 20.1.17).
- Stay lifted for those purposes; otherwise, stay and injunction remain until 31.3.17.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment