W, X, Y And Z, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Health & Ors
The transmission of non-clinical patient information by NHS bodies to the Secretary of State and onward to the Home Office, as required by the Guidance, does not breach common law rights to privacy or confidentiality, nor Article 8 ECHR, because patients are generally notified, the information is limited and subject to safeguards, and the statutory powers under the National Health Service Act 2006 sections 2 and 48 are sufficient. The Guidance does not unlawfully fetter discretion as there is no discretion to withhold the information. The appeal is dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellants: W, X, Y and Z; Respondent: Secretary of State for Health; Interested Party: Secretary of State for the Home Department; Intervener: British Medical Association
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 October 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal From Administrative Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Data Protection, Confidentiality, Statutory Powers, Article 8 ECHR, Immigration Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
W, X, Y and Z
Appellants
Secretary of State for Health
Respondent
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Interested Party
British Medical Association
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal From Administrative Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the transmission of non-clinical patient information from NHS bodies to the Secretary of State and onward to the Home Office is lawful
- 2 Whether such transmission breaches common law rights to privacy/confidentiality
- 3 Whether NHS bodies and the Secretary of State have statutory or common law power to transmit the information
Ratio Decidendi
The transmission of non-clinical patient information by NHS bodies to the Secretary of State and onward to the Home Office, as required by the Guidance, does not breach common law rights to privacy or confidentiality, nor Article 8 ECHR, because patients are generally notified, the information is limited and subject to safeguards, and the statutory powers under the National Health Service Act 2006 sections 2 and 48 are sufficient. The Guidance does not unlawfully fetter discretion as there is no discretion to withhold the information. The appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment