WAHEED ZAMAN (R on the application of) v SECRETARY OF STATE FOR JUSTICE
On the facts, the combination of disputed facts, expert disagreement, prolonged Category A status, and absence of prior oral hearing rendered the refusal to grant an oral hearing unlawful and procedurally unfair under common law and PSI 08/2013.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Waheed Zaman; Defendant: Secretary of State for Justice
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 January 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed
- Legal Topics
- Category a Prisoner Classification, Oral Hearing Requirements, Prison Service Instruction Compliance, Judicial Review Standards
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Waheed Zaman
Claimant
Secretary of State for Justice
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether refusal to grant an oral hearing for Category A prisoner review breached procedural fairness and PSI 08/2013
- 2 Whether disputed facts and expert disagreements required an oral hearing under common law and policy
Ratio Decidendi
On the facts, the combination of disputed facts, expert disagreement, prolonged Category A status, and absence of prior oral hearing rendered the refusal to grant an oral hearing unlawful and procedurally unfair under common law and PSI 08/2013.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed
Orders
- Declaration that refusal to grant oral hearing was unlawful
- Further relief to be determined after submissions
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment