Charles Smith, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Justice
The Secretary of State's refusal to transfer the claimant to open conditions was rational, as there was no wholly persuasive case and expert disagreement existed; the decision not to hold an oral hearing for categorisation review was fair, as no material dispute relevant to risk if unlawfully at large was identified.
- Parties
- Claimant: Charles Smith; Defendant: Secretary of State for Justice
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 September 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Applications for judicial review dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Parole Board Recommendations, Prison Categorisation, Open Conditions Transfer, Oral Hearing Entitlement, Judicial Review Standards
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charles Smith
Claimant
Secretary of State for Justice
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Secretary of State's refusal to transfer the claimant to open conditions was irrational under the Sneddon standard
- 2 Whether the refusal to hold an oral hearing for the claimant's categorisation review was unfair
Ratio Decidendi
The Secretary of State's refusal to transfer the claimant to open conditions was rational, as there was no wholly persuasive case and expert disagreement existed; the decision not to hold an oral hearing for categorisation review was fair, as no material dispute relevant to risk if unlawfully at large was identified.
Court Disposition
Applications for judicial review dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment