Ewing v Security Service [2003] EWHC 2051 (QB) (30 July 2003)
The Investigatory Powers Tribunal is a court within the meaning of Section 42 of the Supreme Court Act 1981, as it exercises judicial functions closely analogous to the High Court's judicial review jurisdiction. The claimant has demonstrated reasonable grounds for bringing his claim before the Tribunal, and leave is granted.
- Citation
- [2003] EWHC 2051 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Terence Patrick Ewing; Defendant: Security Service
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave Under Section 42 of the Supreme Court Act 1981 / Judgment on Application for Leave to Institute Proceedings
- Outcome
- Leave granted
- Legal Topics
- Vexatious Litigants, Definition of 'court' Under Section 42, Investigatory Powers Tribunal Jurisdiction, Data Access Rights, Human Rights Act Compatibility
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Terence Patrick Ewing
Claimant
Security Service
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave Under Section 42 of the Supreme Court Act 1981 / Judgment on Application for Leave to Institute Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Investigatory Powers Tribunal is a 'court' within Section 42 of the Supreme Court Act 1981
- 2 Whether there are reasonable grounds for the claimant to bring proceedings before the Tribunal
Ratio Decidendi
The Investigatory Powers Tribunal is a court within the meaning of Section 42 of the Supreme Court Act 1981, as it exercises judicial functions closely analogous to the High Court's judicial review jurisdiction. The claimant has demonstrated reasonable grounds for bringing his claim before the Tribunal, and leave is granted.
Court Disposition
Leave granted
Orders
- Leave granted to Mr Ewing to continue his claim before the Investigatory Powers Tribunal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment