Citadel Management Inc v Hertzog [2001] EWCA Civ 157 (6 February, 2001)
Security for costs is appropriate where the appellant is resident outside the jurisdiction and enforcement is not possible under relevant conventions; however, the amount sought must be proportionate. £50,000 is reasonable given the circumstances.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 157
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: Citadel Management Inc; Fourth Defendant/respondent: Johan Hertzog
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Security for Costs on Appeal / Court of Appeal, Post Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for security for costs granted; appeal stayed pending provision of security.
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Appeal, Default Judgment, Contempt of Court
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Citadel Management Inc
Claimant/applicant
Johan Hertzog
Fourth Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Security for Costs on Appeal / Court of Appeal, Post Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether security for costs should be ordered against an appellant resident outside the jurisdiction
- 2 What is the appropriate amount for security for costs
Ratio Decidendi
Security for costs is appropriate where the appellant is resident outside the jurisdiction and enforcement is not possible under relevant conventions; however, the amount sought must be proportionate. £50,000 is reasonable given the circumstances.
Court Disposition
Application for security for costs granted; appeal stayed pending provision of security.
Orders
- Security for costs ordered in the sum of £50,000 to be paid within 28 days.
- Appeal to be stayed in the meantime.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment