McGuiness & Anor, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 1956 (06 August 2008)
The consecutive sentence of 12 months for possession of ecstasy was excessive and should be reduced to six months, but remain consecutive. The suspended sentence imposed on Hartin placed him in a worse position than an immediate custodial sentence; therefore, a custodial sentence of 14 months, less time on remand, was substituted.
- Citation
- [2008] EWCA Crim 1956
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; First Appellant: Andrew James McGuiness; Second Appellant: Andrew Ernest Hartin
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 August 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Sentence
- Outcome
- appeals allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Drug Offences, Appeal Against Sentence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Andrew James McGuiness
First Appellant
Andrew Ernest Hartin
Second Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentences imposed on the appellants were wrong in principle or manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether a consecutive sentence for possession of ecstasy was appropriate
- 3 Whether a suspended sentence placed the appellant in a worse position than an immediate custodial sentence
Ratio Decidendi
The consecutive sentence of 12 months for possession of ecstasy was excessive and should be reduced to six months, but remain consecutive. The suspended sentence imposed on Hartin placed him in a worse position than an immediate custodial sentence; therefore, a custodial sentence of 14 months, less time on remand, was substituted.
Court Disposition
appeals allowed in part
Orders
- For McGuiness: consecutive sentence for possession of ecstasy reduced from 12 months to 6 months, total sentence now 22 months' imprisonment less 213 days on remand
- For Hartin: suspended sentence quashed and replaced with 14 months' imprisonment less 213 days on remand, with no requirement to return to custody
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment