Forrester, R. v
The minimum term of five years was excessive on the facts; a minimum term of three and a half years was appropriate. The sentence of imprisonment for public protection was justified due to the significant risk posed by the applicant. Cross-examination of the pre-sentence report author was unnecessary, and the decision not to recommend deportation was not inconsistent with the risk assessment.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Applicant/appellant: Levaun Forrester
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 August 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Firearms Offences, Imprisonment for Public Protection, Deportation Recommendation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Levaun Forrester
Applicant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of imprisonment for public protection with a minimum term of five years was appropriate
- 2 Whether the minimum term imposed was excessive
- 3 Whether the judge erred in refusing to allow cross-examination of the pre-sentence report author
Ratio Decidendi
The minimum term of five years was excessive on the facts; a minimum term of three and a half years was appropriate. The sentence of imprisonment for public protection was justified due to the significant risk posed by the applicant. Cross-examination of the pre-sentence report author was unnecessary, and the decision not to recommend deportation was not inconsistent with the risk assessment.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted limited to the issue of the minimum term.
- Minimum term under sentences of imprisonment for public protection reduced to three and a half years, less 163 days served in custody.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment