R v Kyle Buckley
The original sentences were unduly lenient as they failed to reflect the seriousness of the offences, particularly as they were committed in prison against emergency workers and in separate incidents. Just and proportionate punishment required the 18-month term to run consecutively to the life sentence, not concurrently.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Rex; Offender: Kyle Buckley
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 November 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Reference by Attorney General Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988; Review of Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; sentences quashed and substituted
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Dangerous Offenders, Totality Principle, Offences in Prison, Assault on Emergency Worker
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecutor
Kyle Buckley
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Reference by Attorney General Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988; Review of Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the original sentence was unduly lenient
- 2 Whether the judge should have considered dangerousness and imposed an extended sentence
- 3 Whether sentences should have been consecutive to the life sentence
Ratio Decidendi
The original sentences were unduly lenient as they failed to reflect the seriousness of the offences, particularly as they were committed in prison against emergency workers and in separate incidents. Just and proportionate punishment required the 18-month term to run consecutively to the life sentence, not concurrently.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; sentences quashed and substituted
Orders
- Sentences of four months (count 3), one month (count 5), 18 months (count 6), and six months (count 7) detention in a young offender institution imposed, all to run concurrently with each other but consecutively to the life sentence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment