R v Thomas Davies

R v Thomas Davies

The sentence was unduly lenient due to failure to apply the relevant Sentencing Council Guideline, incorrect assessment of culpability, and insufficient recognition of the harm caused. The appropriate sentence is 8 months’ imprisonment, suspended for 12 months, with a 12-month driving disqualification.

Parties
Prosecutor: Rex; Offender: Thomas Davies
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
06 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Reference by Attorney General Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
Outcome
sentence quashed and substituted
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Causing Bodily Harm by Wanton or Furious Driving, Unduly Lenient Sentence, Application of Sentencing Guidelines
Criminal Law Sentencing Causing Bodily Harm by Wanton or Furious Driving Unduly Lenient Sentence Application of Sentencing Guidelines

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecutor

Thomas Davies

Offender

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Reference by Attorney General Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed was unduly lenient
  2. 2 Whether the Sentencing Council’s Definitive Guideline was properly applied
  3. 3 Appropriate level of culpability and harm for the offence

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence was unduly lenient due to failure to apply the relevant Sentencing Council Guideline, incorrect assessment of culpability, and insufficient recognition of the harm caused. The appropriate sentence is 8 months’ imprisonment, suspended for 12 months, with a 12-month driving disqualification.

Court Disposition

sentence quashed and substituted

Orders

  • 8 months’ imprisonment suspended for 12 months
  • 12-month driving disqualification imposed