Serenity Housing Service Ltd v Ofsted
The appeal was filed outside the 28-day statutory time limit set by s.21(2) Care Standards Act 2000. None of the appellant's reasons—including late receipt, lack of legal advice, misunderstanding of the time limit, or awaiting further information—amounted to exceptional circumstances. Therefore, the tribunal had no discretion to extend time, and the appeal could not be admitted.
- Parties
- Appellant: Serenity Housing Service Ltd; Respondent: Ofsted
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 January 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Tribunal Appeal / Decision on Late Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed as out of time; no extension granted.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeal Procedure, Care Standards Act 2000, Exceptional Circumstances, Service of Notice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Serenity Housing Service Ltd
Appellant
Ofsted
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Appeal / Decision on Late Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal against Ofsted's Notice of Suspension was filed within the statutory time limit
- 2 Whether there are exceptional circumstances justifying an extension of time for filing the appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was filed outside the 28-day statutory time limit set by s.21(2) Care Standards Act 2000. None of the appellant's reasons—including late receipt, lack of legal advice, misunderstanding of the time limit, or awaiting further information—amounted to exceptional circumstances. Therefore, the tribunal had no discretion to extend time, and the appeal could not be admitted.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed as out of time; no extension granted.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- The final hearing on 12 February 2026 is vacated.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment