Mersey Docks Property Holdings & Ors v Kilgour
Claimants failed to take all reasonable steps to ascertain and serve the claim form at the fourth defendant's last known place of business, and did not act promptly in seeking extension of time; therefore, service was not valid under CPR Part 6.5 and extension of time was not justified.
- Parties
- Claimant: Mersey Docks Property Holdings Ltd.; Claimant: Spade Lane Cool Stores Ltd.; Claimant: Sheerness Cool Stores Ltd.; Fourth Defendant: Michael Kilgour
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 June 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Preliminary Issue Determination
- Outcome
- Claimants did not validly serve the claim form on the fourth defendant.
- Legal Topics
- Service of Claim Form, Extension of Time, Assignment of Claims
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mersey Docks Property Holdings Ltd.
Claimant
Spade Lane Cool Stores Ltd.
Claimant
Sheerness Cool Stores Ltd.
Claimant
Michael Kilgour
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Preliminary Issue Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Meaning of 'last known place of business' under CPR Part 6.5(6)
- 2 Imputation of assignor's knowledge to assignee
- 3 Principles for extension of time under CPR 7.6
Ratio Decidendi
Claimants failed to take all reasonable steps to ascertain and serve the claim form at the fourth defendant's last known place of business, and did not act promptly in seeking extension of time; therefore, service was not valid under CPR Part 6.5 and extension of time was not justified.
Court Disposition
Claimants did not validly serve the claim form on the fourth defendant.
Orders
- No extension of time for service granted.
- Fourth defendant not validly served; claim against him statute-barred.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment