Secretary of State for Health & Ors v Servier Laboratories Ltd & Ors [2012] EWHC 2761 (Ch) (12 October 2012)
Given the substantial overlap between the present proceedings and the Commission's investigation, the risk of conflicting decisions, the burden on the defendants, and the uncertain scope of the French Blocking Statute, the court determined that the proceedings should be stayed in their entirety until the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2012] EWHC 2761 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimants: The Secretary of State for Health and Others; Defendant: Servier Laboratories Limited; Defendant: Servier Research and Development Limited; Defendant: Les Laboratoires Servier SAS; Defendant: Servier SAS
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 October 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Stay of Proceedings / Interlocutory (second Case Management Conference)
- Outcome
- Stay granted
- Legal Topics
- Article 101 TFEU, Article 102 TFEU, Patent Settlement Agreements, Abuse of Dominant Position, Tortious Interference, Disclosure, French Blocking Statute
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Secretary of State for Health and Others
Claimants
Servier Laboratories Limited
Defendant
Servier Research and Development Limited
Defendant
Les Laboratoires Servier SAS
Defendant
Servier SAS
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Stay of Proceedings / Interlocutory (second Case Management Conference)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to grant a stay of proceedings due to overlap with ongoing European Commission investigation
- 2 Risk of conflicting decisions between national court and Commission
- 3 Appropriateness of proceeding with disclosure before Commission decision
Ratio Decidendi
Given the substantial overlap between the present proceedings and the Commission's investigation, the risk of conflicting decisions, the burden on the defendants, and the uncertain scope of the French Blocking Statute, the court determined that the proceedings should be stayed in their entirety until the Commission's process is complete. The balance of justice favours a stay to avoid prejudice, wasted costs, and parallel litigation, and the claimants' concerns about evidence preservation do not outweigh these factors.
Court Disposition
Stay granted
Orders
- Entire proceedings stayed pending the outcome of the European Commission's investigation and any subsequent appeals.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment