The Secretary of State for Health & Anor v Servier Laboratories Ltd
The only finding of fact in the General Court's judgment that is res judicata with absolute effect is that the Commission had not established that the relevant finished goods market was limited to perindopril. None of Servier's subsidiary factual propositions are binding in these proceedings. It is not an abuse of...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- English Claimants: The Secretary of State for Health and Another; Scottish/ni Claimants: The Scottish Ministers and Others; Welsh Claimants: The Welsh Ministers and Others; Defendant: Servier Laboratories Limited; Defendant: Servier Research and Development Limited; Defendant: Les Laboratoires Servier SAS; Defendant: Servier SAS
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 April 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Damages Action (private Enforcement) / Preliminary Issues—binding Effect of EU General Court Findings and Abuse of Process
- Outcome
- Application by Servier dismissed—none of the contested factual findings are res judicata or precluded by abuse of process.
- Legal Topics
- Res Judicata (issue Estoppel) Under EU Law, Abuse of Process Under English Law, Binding Effect of EU Judgments in National Proceedings, Market Definition in Competition Law, Mitigation and Causation in Damages Claims
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Secretary of State for Health and Another
English Claimants
The Scottish Ministers and Others
Scottish/ni Claimants
The Welsh Ministers and Others
Welsh Claimants
Servier Laboratories Limited
Defendant
Servier Research and Development Limited
Defendant
Les Laboratoires Servier SAS
Defendant
Servier SAS
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Competition Damages Action (private Enforcement) / Preliminary Issues—binding Effect of EU General Court Findings and Abuse of Process
Legal Issues
- 1 Are factual findings of the EU General Court in annulment proceedings binding as res judicata in subsequent national private damages actions?
- 2 Is it an abuse of process for claimants connected to the UK government to contest such findings or adduce contrary evidence in English proceedings?
Ratio Decidendi
The only finding of fact in the General Court's judgment that is res judicata with absolute effect is that the Commission had not established that the relevant finished goods market was limited to perindopril. None of Servier's subsidiary factual propositions are binding in these proceedings. It is not an abuse of process for the claimants to contest those findings or adduce contrary evidence, given their limited involvement in the EU proceedings.
Court Disposition
Application by Servier dismissed—none of the contested factual findings are res judicata or precluded by abuse of process.
Orders
- None of Servier's factual propositions are binding as res judicata in these proceedings.
- It is not an abuse of process for the claimants to contest or adduce evidence contrary to those propositions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment