Secretary of State for Health & Ors v Servier Laboratories Ltd & Ors
A stay of the proceedings is ordered until shortly after the conclusion of the oral hearing before the European Commission, to avoid unfairly burdening Servier with parallel litigation and to prevent the risk of conflicting decisions. However, the stay is not to continue beyond a short period after the oral hearing, and standard disclosure should then proceed. The French Blocking Statute does not justify further delay in disclosure, as the risk of prosecution is merely theoretical. The possible joinder of further parties does not affect the decision on the stay.
- Parties
- Claimants: The Secretary of State for Health and Others; Defendant: Servier Laboratories Limited; Defendant: Servier Research and Development Limited; Defendant: Les Laboratoires Servier SAS; Defendant: Servier SAS
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 October 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (competition/antitrust, Tort) / Interlocutory Application for Stay Pending Outcome of European Commission Investigation
- Outcome
- Stay granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Proceedings, Abuse of Dominant Position, Patent Settlement Agreements, Tortious Interference With Economic Interests, Disclosure Obligations, French Blocking Statute
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Secretary of State for Health and Others
Claimants
Servier Laboratories Limited
Defendant
Servier Research and Development Limited
Defendant
Les Laboratoires Servier SAS
Defendant
Servier SAS
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (competition/antitrust, Tort) / Interlocutory Application for Stay Pending Outcome of European Commission Investigation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to grant a stay of proceedings pending the outcome of the European Commission's investigation into alleged infringements of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU by Servier
- 2 Whether the French Blocking Statute prevents disclosure by the French defendants
- 3 Whether the claimants are prejudiced by delay in disclosure and evidence gathering
Ratio Decidendi
A stay of the proceedings is ordered until shortly after the conclusion of the oral hearing before the European Commission, to avoid unfairly burdening Servier with parallel litigation and to prevent the risk of conflicting decisions. However, the stay is not to continue beyond a short period after the oral hearing, and standard disclosure should then proceed. The French Blocking Statute does not justify further delay in disclosure, as the risk of prosecution is merely theoretical. The possible joinder of further parties does not affect the decision on the stay.
Court Disposition
Stay granted in part
Orders
- Proceedings stayed until shortly after the conclusion of the oral hearing before the European Commission; thereafter, standard disclosure to proceed with an adjusted timetable as agreed or directed by the court.
- Servier to provide formal responses to certain Part 18 requests for further information.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment